Engine guru's needed!!!

4GTuner

Help Support 4GTuner:

Romeo, I've done back to backs a couple of times re Cyclone vs ASpec style log inlet manifolds. While the Cyclone manifolds make a little better torque/power under 3000 rpm, the ASpec consistently makes much better top end power ( on my dyno at least !). Maybe that's why Mitsubishi stopped using the dual runner manifold on their Evo 3 onwards 4G63 engines ?
 
Here you go...

The actual cfm difference between the Auspec and Japspec intakes was on average around 20cfm in the Auspec favour.
 

Attachments

  • Test result.jpg
    Test result.jpg
    90.7 KB
  • Test results.jpg
    Test results.jpg
    99.5 KB
  • Intakes1modified.jpg
    Intakes1modified.jpg
    97 KB
  • Intakes3.jpg
    Intakes3.jpg
    96.3 KB
  • Intakes4.jpg
    Intakes4.jpg
    97.1 KB
  • JMFDrag%20Ports.jpg
    JMFDrag%20Ports.jpg
    88.7 KB
  • Magnus Intake.jpg
    Magnus Intake.jpg
    187.7 KB
  • PMW%20Ports.jpg
    PMW%20Ports.jpg
    83.7 KB

Latest posts

Back
Top