EVO front cross members (K frames) structural differences.

4GTuner

Help Support 4GTuner:

SKMsport

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
110
Location
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Hi everyone,

I am currently replacing my front EVO 3? cross member after being bent in and accident.

Now I brought a cross member off Ebay, saying it was a 1,2,3 item.

I have noticed some structural differences between the two items,

Which is making it hard to identify which item is actually the EVO 2/3 part. or another EVO model.

The cross member that came out of my car is supposedly an EVO 3 item, but there is no proof of that.

I have attached pictures of the difference. I have highlighted in red the area where the difference is.


The first lot of pictures are from the one I got off Ebay,

photo (49).JPG

photo (50).JPG

photo (55).JPG

These are the pictures from the one in the car, Supposedly EVO 3.

photo (51).JPG

photo (52).JPG

photo (53).JPG

And both together.

photo (54).JPG

If anyone knows that would be great,

Thanks,
 
Possibly a GSR crossmember. The evos had subtle differences when compared to a GSR/standard Lancer with additional bracing and reinforcements.
 
The Evo II/III definitely has wider track due to the crossmember; I measured against an Evo I crossmember and the difference was significant. The extra wheelbase comes from the control arms on the II/III though. My Evo 1 has a 2/3 crossmember with Evo 1 control arms (and custom ball joints, rotors spaced out 15mm), I have major tire clearance issues at the back of the wheel-well on stock-height tires, but a crazy amount of front track.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top