RVR hypergear running SD mode

4GTuner

Help Support 4GTuner:

vr401

4G63T
Joined
Jan 31, 2006
Messages
929
Location
Sydney
As above. Anyone thought about this. Is it worth converting it to SD and remove AFM or waste of time?


Cheers
 
Benzo4gT said:
A great mod IMO, definitely not a waste of time. Do you have ECMlink?
No.

We have evo8 ecu with SD patch mod. and all supporting hardware to go with it.
 
I have SD setup on my Evo with Evo 5 ecu. Its more suited to cars with big cam setups in my knowledge (which is my next mod), but it does make the on off throttle transition very smooth in my car at the moment...and if any cooler pipes blow off it is still possible to drive the car.
 
Why change? The maf measures airflow. Sd calculates it.
Stick with a maf. They are rescalable and the 482 and 399 maf are good for 300awkw+.
I cant think of a good reason to move away. I think that ecmlink has a good rep for sd. And evoscan/ecuflash is reasonable now but had issues earlier. Only other reason is if you have run out of loggable inputs, but there is a logging cable for ecuflash now that allows 5 extra inputs.
Space is only other reason
 
I am with Jack, do not get rid of the MAS unless you are:

- just MUST run vented BOV

Or

- running out of MAS capacity (over 400-500 hp depending on which MAS you are using)
 
I think from a tuning pov, air density allows greater flexibility in situations mentioned above like big arse cams. But overall It's just two different ways of doing the same thing.
 
Back
Top