Jump to content

Welcome to 4GTuner
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Compression test for 4g93

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1
Graysmith

Graysmith

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationNewcastle

What psi figure should be obtained for a good 1995 CC GSR. 4g93 turbo?



#2
leadfoot

leadfoot

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 3,429 posts
  • LocationGold Coast

anything over 140 is usually considered "good" but to really guage the health of you engine as all gauges are different you want to do it this way

 

first do whats called a dry compression test. measure each cylinder and note the pressure. you want as little difference between cylinders if a cylinder is more than 10 psi lower than other this generally indicates an issue with that cylinder.

 

now go and put about a teaspoon in each cylinder use a syringe or something so you can get down past the spark plug hole and get the oil on the cylinder wall our engine run a dish top piston so unless you want to go putting 13-15 cc's of oil in each cylinder you want to get it on the walls not the piston tops. run the test again you want to see a small (less than 5-10 psi) increase. a small increase will indicate slightly worn rings to good health a big increase is worn rings no rise will indicate bad valves.

 

my 4g93turbo read 150psi


yes it's me KHUBNER


#3
Dave_GSR1.8

Dave_GSR1.8

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts
  • LocationMelbourne

I've never seen a figure quoted by Mitsubishi but I may not be looking in the right places; there may not be a definitive number out there.

 

FYI my 4g93t (stock) gave 180 psi (dry) across all four cylinders. Not sure how accurate that number is, as it seems a bit higher compared to most other posters. I have seen numbers between 150 and 180 quoted on a number of different threads so as it seems to me that anything over 150 is OK. As khubner said, its more important that you get pretty much the same across all four cylinders. To be really thorough about it you should do a wet and dry compression test and a leak down test to pinpoint any probs.   



#4
leadfoot

leadfoot

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 3,429 posts
  • LocationGold Coast

also every guage is different i think mine tops out around 150 as on of our 11:1 2tr-fe motor gave 150 aswell it's a bigger engine with higher compression and still reads 150 somethings fishy with the reading so if my gauge hits 150 we say all if good since a valve got stuck and read zero


yes it's me KHUBNER


#5
jack be nimble

jack be nimble

    master of none

  • Donating Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,301 posts
  • Locationperth sor. 20 mins from brians place
The dry reading for the 93t is in the fsm. Im not at laptop so I dunno what it says. But I seen it
4g93t jumbuck conversion. PRANGED 18/3/12, CHECK MY MEMBER RIDES Page 11. no serious human injuries.
ON THE ENGINE STAND. g4cs 2.4l + Gt35r. PLUS: auto conversion + Awd coming.
thanks for parts and help: BMGTZ, EVOCPE, cwolf, Benozi, Jamo-GSR, 1JUM2NV, RXVII..much appreciated, cheers guys.
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. —Enzo Ferrari
REMEMBER: you cant polish a turd, but you can roll it in glitter.

#6
Graysmith

Graysmith

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • LocationNewcastle

On the dry test the readings were 135psi, very close all cylinders. I tried the oil test and came up to 180psi on all cylinders so it would seem the rings are shot even though the car runs quite well ( 1.15 at Wakefield Park) and does not burn much oil. 



#7
leadfoot

leadfoot

    Moderator

  • Moderators
  • 3,429 posts
  • LocationGold Coast

that would only indicate possibly worn rings best to do now would be leak down test


yes it's me KHUBNER



1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users