Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
different Turbo on 4g93
#1
Posted 11 May 2015 - 09:48 AM
#2
Posted 11 May 2015 - 01:28 PM
if it's any bigger than the 16g and you street the car you don't "need" it the 16g has plenty of puff for that boost level on a 1.8.
my 1.8l is no std 1.8 and it doesn't even come close to touching all of the available CFM of the 16g.
the biggest deciding factor for me would be the turbine "hot" side if it's any larger than the 16g it will be laggy if it's the same as a 16g then sure why not but tbh a 1.8 is right in the middle of the compressor map for a 16g possibly allitle low on it actually.
the reason we all run 16g's when the 2l boys go bigger is because they are a considerable improvement over our little td04 13t's for us running a 16g is like a 2l running a td06 20g
- Nmko likes this
yes it's me KHUBNER
#3
Posted 11 May 2015 - 01:31 PM
#4
Posted 11 May 2015 - 09:46 PM
#5
Posted 11 May 2015 - 10:41 PM
Hey svanh1993, sorry I haven't replied to you om yet, it was a long one with a lot to take in.
I'd suggest running something smaller on a stock bottom end than that turbo, mostly because you'll be running it way below it's efficiency range with the boost you'll be able to run. I wouldn't think that a bottom end running 10.5:1 compression pistons will hold up for too long on 12psi with that size turbo. You'll be pumping a fair amount of air into the engine. You could run less, but that will involve changing the wastegate actuator and making up a custom mount for one with a lighter spring to run 8-9psi.
Is it a genuine Garrett turbo? You might be better off selling it and buying a brand new Td04 and running that at 10psi and getting some change $$. This will also mean you can use a standard exhaust manifold.
Believe me, on a high comp bottom end, you want a really responsive little turbo. You can't run high boost anyway, so you're best off going with a smaller turbo and getting as much low down torque out of the setup as you can.
Speaking from experience high comp/td04l turbo is an amazing combo, more than enough to spin the wheels in 1st and 2nd (3rd in the wet). Also, it's nice to know you can give it heaps without worrying about throwing a rod.
- CLuTZ likes this
#6
Posted 11 May 2015 - 10:43 PM
Is a gt25 a disco potato? It wouldn't be to different to a 16g I wouldn't think, I know a few guys running potatoes on their 4agze engines which are only a 1.6l and if it was way bigger it would be terrible on such a small motor, unless they get a better power range due to high revving.
GT2871r is a T28 with a ball bearing centre and a bigger exhaust housing from memory.
I've heard of people running these on 4agze engines too, and they are big for that setup, but the numbers these guys are getting speak for themselves.
#7
Posted 11 May 2015 - 11:57 PM
#8
Posted 12 May 2015 - 12:15 AM
As far as I'm aware this will be around the same size as a big 16g, but with the added spool benefit of being ball bearing.
It'll be fine on low boost, and you've got the high compression of the engine to give you power off boost. The car should drive the same as it does now when it's off boost, and then hit hard when the turbo spools up. Being a ball bearing centre and being on a high comp engine means it'll probably make positive pressure by 1,500 - 2,000rpm.
Do you know what spring rate the wastegate actuator is? As this will determine your base boost level.
The only concern you'll have will be how much boost the rods will take. You also want to make sure your tune is spot on, as any sign of detonation will be a big deal on this setup.
#9
Posted 12 May 2015 - 01:41 AM
#10
Posted 12 May 2015 - 03:58 AM
And potatoes make chips, i like chips.
win win.
- VIN18M likes this
ON THE ENGINE STAND. g4cs 2.4l + Gt35r. PLUS: auto conversion + Awd coming.
thanks for parts and help: BMGTZ, EVOCPE, cwolf, Benozi, Jamo-GSR, 1JUM2NV, RXVII..much appreciated, cheers guys.
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. —Enzo Ferrari
REMEMBER: you cant polish a turd, but you can roll it in glitter.
#11
Posted 12 May 2015 - 04:09 AM
#13
Posted 12 May 2015 - 06:49 AM
Im excited. Anything about disco is exciting.
And potatoes make chips, i like chips.
win win.
Disco biscuits are better.
Trust in the master of taxis.... He will set you straight[/quote]
#14
Posted 12 May 2015 - 08:19 AM
Gt2560r is equivalent to s14/s15 t28 turbo
Gt2860r (disco potato) has bigger turbine wheel but same or similar compressor wheel.
Gt2871r has same turbine wheel as disco potato (gt2860r) but bigger compressor wheel. There are also three different trims from memory.
Best to refer to garrett website for compressor/turbine measurements in order to compare it against 16g td05h.
As far as I remember 16g is relatively close match to smallest trim of gt2871r.
#15
Posted 12 May 2015 - 08:26 AM
#16
Posted 12 May 2015 - 12:57 PM
With the trims you've given me, your gt2871r has compressor wheel with 49.20mm inducer and 71mm exducer. Turbine wheel with the trim 76 has 53mm inducer and 46.2mm exducer. And you have options of having .64 A/R or .86 A/R exhaust housings.
16g td05h has a compressor wheel with 48.3 inducer and 68mm exducer. Turbine wheel has a 56mm inducer and 49.2 exducer. Exhaust housing is 7cm^2 which is equivalent to .49 A/R.
Pic below might make it easier to compare
In conclusion gt2871r has a slightly bigger compressor wheel but smaller turbine. However has a larger A/R exhaust housing than 16G TD05H.
If you wish to get into more detail which one is more suitable you might want to use calculators available online to plot engine demand data at various boost levels and rpm against compressor maps.
#17
Posted 12 May 2015 - 01:29 PM
#18
Posted 12 May 2015 - 02:00 PM
- White Knight likes this
#19
Posted 12 May 2015 - 11:57 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users