Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
1993 Lancer GSR
#161
Posted 16 July 2008 - 04:30 AM
Your boost control also seems better too with the .63
What controller are you using?
AMG | http://www.4gtuner.c...mmc-galant-amg/
GVR4 | http://www.4gtuner.c...shi-galant-vr4/
Springy Motors | Autronic | Motec
#162
Posted 16 July 2008 - 04:43 AM
I'm interested to see how much fatter we can make the curve if we can get the boost into it a bit lower. The dyno sheet below is from a mate's 180sx - 2L SR20, same basic specs (turbo, cams, static compression ratio) as my car .. check out where it's making 25psi:
http://www.silviansw...08/IMG_6242.jpg
It's a VERY impressive car to drive, and an absolute monster on the street.
#163
Posted 20 July 2008 - 09:02 AM
The clutch was ratshit by the end of the day (had 12 runs or so), and might be why the car was slower to half track earlier in the day before slip was really noticable.
#164
Posted 20 July 2008 - 10:34 AM
#165
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:21 PM
Here's a couple of vids of me getting chopped up by some 8s today:
#166
Posted 21 July 2008 - 06:26 AM
E1 - 2.2 400kw atw 25psi
#167
Posted 21 July 2008 - 08:01 AM
#168
Posted 17 November 2008 - 12:08 AM
A few updates, but nothing very exciting. I (finally) received the rebuild kit for my OS giken clutch. It's been an awesome clutch, but I'd be hard pressed to recommend it to anyone considering it's took almost two months to get a new set of plates for it.
I picked up the ohlins that Dan had for sale and installed them a few months ago. They've been great; the spring rates (7.5/5) are pretty good, and the dampening is superb.
I bought a rear clutch pack LSD and had it rebuilt with GSR ratios, but that's sitting on the garage floor waiting for motivation to install it.
Over the last week I've been cleaning out the nightmare (!) that is the wiring in the engine bay. It's a total joke, and is looking like there's a good few weeks of work there for me. I'll be relocating the battery to the boot at the same time (picking up the parts to do most of that today) and making a new loom for the E8 from scratch.
Can anyone tell me just how modular the standard looms through out the engine bay are? Or better yet, is there a diagram some where that will tell me what circuits are in each loom? I'm getting to the point where I want to rip the current one out (it's completely butchered) and start from scratch, only keeping the circuits I need.
Because the battery is going to the boot, I'm going to relocate the surge tank outside under the car on the drivers side. Two reasons; I don't like the idea of the having the battery and surge tank in the same compartment, and I'm getting sick of constantly smelling petrol inside the car.
I'll just slog away at it slowly for now, I've 'misplaced' my license for a few months, so I've got plenty of time to do it.
Edited by steve, 17 November 2008 - 01:23 AM.
#169
Posted 17 November 2008 - 01:38 AM
Look ut 10z hehehe
#170
Posted 17 November 2008 - 02:23 AM
i know that feeling champ.I've 'misplaced' my license for a few months, so I've got plenty of time to do it.
great excuse to keep the mods rolling on it.
ohlins look great
keep us updated.
#171
Posted 25 November 2008 - 12:27 PM
Love your last run at wsid against the silver VY SS, can hear the compressor spool from the crowd! awesome..
Is the 0.82 just to large for the engine, or does it need to breath better on the inlet side to get the most from it? was suprised to see it didnt make more top end power. Next time you go to the strip, get someone to snap a pic of your car from behind as your launching!
Good work mate.
Edited by JAP63, 25 November 2008 - 12:38 PM.
He was right (now back to a F**kn Barina) Lookn for a 7 though !!!!!!!!In no time you'll realise you made a mistake.
You'll be back
#172
Posted 25 November 2008 - 10:49 PM
There was definitely more top end with the 0.82. It made another 10hp atw on 3 psi less than the 0.63 when we dug up a 4th gear run, and the tune with the 0.82 was a fair bit less aggressive than what is in it now. Had we put 25 psi into the 0.82 with the same sort of tune, it probably would've gone upwards of 450hp atw.
I guess I don't think one is better than the other really - it depends on your final goal. My goal was never outright power; I only ever wanted 125mph with as much mid-range as I could muster in street trim. At the time I bought the turbo, it was hard to find other people's results (besides out of the states, which I don't believe are comparable to what we do over here). I was pretty confident that the compressor would reach my goals, but unsure on the smaller rear housing, so went for the 0.82 as a safety buffer, not believing that the 0.63 would be able to handle 25psi which is what I calculated it'd need to go 500 engine hp. Had I known what I do now, I'd have gone the 0.63 from the start.
Here's a pic of it launching the same day the vids were taken. Excuse the smoke, that's from bouncing off the limiter. You've gotta love the shitty IRS design in these winding that much neg on under squat .. almost as bad as a 1600 lol.
Edited by steve, 25 November 2008 - 11:02 PM.
#173
Posted 26 November 2008 - 01:33 AM
So them runs are with the .63 and 426 Hp then?
Do you think the .82 would bump your trap speed up? if so, i wonder if the ET would be any lower?
interseting when you play around with setups...I agree, the car is likely more driveable and more fun with the 0.63, you start getting to that outright 'drag' type setup eventually and its no fun, especially if you go around hills on the weekend.
Youre saying you thought the .63 would 'choke' with the delivery from the compressor? interesting that it didnt,Did you dig up compressor flow charts when looking at all this?I was pretty confident that the compressor would reach my goals, but unsure on the smaller rear housing, so went for the 0.82 as a safety buffer, not believing that the 0.63 would be able to handle 25psi
Does that mean theres still plenty left in the compressor wheel then?, perhaps try more boost with the .63 or would you then have to swap to the bigger turbine housing?Had we put 25 psi into the 0.82 with the same sort of tune, it probably would've gone upwards of 450hp atw.
Edited by JAP63, 26 November 2008 - 01:35 AM.
He was right (now back to a F**kn Barina) Lookn for a 7 though !!!!!!!!In no time you'll realise you made a mistake.
You'll be back
#174
Posted 26 November 2008 - 02:44 AM
It wasn't the compressor I though would be choked by the smaller housing, more the engine itself. I thought the extra restriction would end up sending EGT up and causing more exhaust reversion, so less timing and boost. I've had bad experiences with poorly matched turbine housings in the past, so wanted to try and avoid that again.
I honestly couldn't tell you how much compressor is left. Garrett rate them at ~525hp, and so I always figured I was getting close to it's limit, but recently we've seen one supply enough air to go ~470hp atw on a 2.3L GSR. On the other hand, a mate's 180sx made pretty much the same power (~430hp atw) on 25 psi as it did on 22psi, suggesting it might be out of flow.
I'm not really game to run much more than 25psi on pump, so I don't think I'll go winding any more boost into her
#175
Posted 26 November 2008 - 03:06 AM
It wasn't the compressor I though would be choked by the smaller housing, more the engine itself. I thought the extra restriction would end up sending EGT up and causing more exhaust reversion, so less timing and boost.
I didnt realise you were on pump fuel, thats pretty friggin impressive figures then....I remeber reading cases in the states of pinging and all sorts off dramas on 63's when the egt's went thru the roof on their TD05's, i think they were talking around 950-1000 deg farenheit and they were running into issues.
Interesting, sounds a bit like a guessing game and whatever works for each individual engine is probably the go, even cylinder head design and chamber size would effect how much gas it would 'let through' so to speak i guess. Did yous happen to log inlet temps on you mates 180 when it made the same power between the 25 and 22 psi runs? I guess if you could see it getting radically hotter thatd indicate its limitssupply enough air to go ~470hp atw on a 2.3L GSR. On the other hand, a mate's 180sx made pretty much the same power (~430hp atw) on 25 psi as it did on 22psi, suggesting it might be out of flow.
Edited by JAP63, 26 November 2008 - 03:10 AM.
He was right (now back to a F**kn Barina) Lookn for a 7 though !!!!!!!!In no time you'll realise you made a mistake.
You'll be back
#176
Posted 29 November 2008 - 01:23 AM
It's to go under the car on the driver's side of the spare wheel well. Now I've just gotta find someone local to make it up for me.
#177
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:22 AM
Edited by EVO-00X, 02 July 2009 - 11:29 AM.
330kw atw @ 28psi 98 pump fuel.
372kw atw @ 28psi E85 Flexfuel.
EVOLVED AWD COUPE
WWW.EVOCOUPE.NET
#178
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:31 AM
GENUINE CE9A evo2 gsr track car
all fabrication BJP AUTOMOTIVE
winton 1:27.4 /// sandown 1:21.5 /// phillip island 1:49.2 /// haunted hills 59.1 /// eastern creek 1:35.4 /// winton short 1:01.4
#179
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:42 AM
330kw atw @ 28psi 98 pump fuel.
372kw atw @ 28psi E85 Flexfuel.
EVOLVED AWD COUPE
WWW.EVOCOUPE.NET
#180
Posted 02 July 2009 - 10:36 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users