Jump to content

Welcome to 4GTuner
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Heres an evo 6 for ya.....

- - - - -

  • Please log in to reply
320 replies to this topic

#121
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
...

Edited by S15ETA, 07 April 2010 - 10:11 AM.


#122
tenji`

tenji`

    STIKLR

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,252 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
ill ask for ya mate :)
www.gaijinemotion.com
We are the Aftermarket & rare parts Specialists

( New website coming soon please stay tuned! for now please visit & LIKE our FACEBOOK PAGE )

#123
WRCVR4

WRCVR4

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,660 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, VIC
Shit, any ideas why ?
Current ride: '99 GTO
Old ride: EVO VI
Old ride: JSpec VR4

#124
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
id say it shit a bearing and went through the block and breaking the rod and smashing the piston to bits, but i could be wrong......here some pics....one of whats left of the rod i pulled out of the block and the others of the hole just behind the turbo next to the gearbox......shit pics but u can just make it out

Attached Thumbnails

  • DSC00135.jpg
  • DSC00134.jpg
  • DSC00131.jpg

Edited by S15ETA, 25 December 2008 - 09:44 AM.


#125
Dean

Dean

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 6,558 posts
  • LocationMelbourne VIC
sorry to hear bud.
the streets will be quiet again with the beast off the road for a while.
well that makes 2 of us now with fried motors :S
4G93T No More

#126
bazeng

bazeng

    Gday maaaate

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,899 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
Harry,

What about using a 4g64 block and bolt on your head?
You'll need new pistons and rods
Apart from that, factory crank and get squirters in.

Perfect for the street and track!

#127
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne

Harry,

What about using a 4g64 block and bolt on your head?
You'll need new pistons and rods
Apart from that, factory crank and get squirters in.

Perfect for the street and track!


yeh i was thinkin bout that baz....dougmo says the block is taller than the 63.....so im wonderin how it would fit......like the mounts and height of the sump off the ground, the 63 sump hangs a bit low as it is stock.....but really the 2.4 would be the way to go with a fuk load of torque:cool:

#128
ENGINR

ENGINR

    Wannabe Racer

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 5,061 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
Use the 4G63 block and a stroker crank/piston combination instead - straight bolt in when you look at the engine bay side of things and no stress.

You get 2.3 litres instead of 2.4 - but who's really going to notice? :confused:
‎"I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about." - Peter Griffin

#129
JSTYLE

JSTYLE

    I AM THEEE DYNO QUEEN!

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4,565 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, Australia

Use the 4G63 block and a stroker crank/piston combination instead - straight bolt in when you look at the engine bay side of things and no stress.

You get 2.3 litres instead of 2.4 - but who's really going to notice? :confused:


Money wise, it would be cheaper to go a 2.4 block instead of trying to source and buy an evo 4-9 block. But that said a 4G63 with stroker crank and all that would be the go i reckon, if money isnt an issue.

Jon
Name: Jon
Current Rides:
My06 Evolution IX 12.11 @ 113mph 252kw (street weight)
1997 Proton Satria GLi (daily)
Previous Rides
1993 Mitsubishi Lancer GSR 4G93T 200kw @ hubs 12.1 @ 115.5mph
1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo 1 (CD9A) 225kw, 20g, stock ecu, hks 264s 12.050 @ 116.5mph OHH YERRR

#130
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
i just took off the head, and fuk me! theres another hole on the other side of the block, the cyl wall has chunks missing and theres a bit of damage around the valves.....the head might be repairable i guess

#131
bazeng

bazeng

    Gday maaaate

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,899 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
The height of the block only affects the top part of the motor so the sump etc will stay the same (deck height will change).

Also, as for 2.3L vs 2.4L, one benifit in 2.4L over 2.3L is a longer skirt piston which will reduce the amount of piston rock in comparison to the 2.3L short skirt pistons. The downside is the additional weight of the full sized piston in the 2.4L setup. But both are good.

As for cost, its pretty much the same for both setups. The only change would be machining for squirters if you go the 2.4L block. As for sourcing the block, what Jstyle says is true. It'll be easier / cheaper to find a 4g64 block over a used evo6-9 block. All the other costs incurred will be much of a muchness.

Either way, 2.3L or 2.4L they will both be better than the 2.0L overall in your application.

If you wanted to, go the 2.4L block / 2.0L crank some long rods and custom pistons. You'll be able to rev that mother out to 10k without any issues!! (they call this the 2.1L destroked motor). The only problem with this is trying to shift at 10,000rpm.

#132
tenji`

tenji`

    STIKLR

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,252 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
i spoke to adam he may have something
www.gaijinemotion.com
We are the Aftermarket & rare parts Specialists

( New website coming soon please stay tuned! for now please visit & LIKE our FACEBOOK PAGE )

#133
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
ah well......sweet! let me know polo, brother!!!

#134
NASI

NASI

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 771 posts
  • LocationVIC
Well if your block is stuffed and head why not go for 2.6L stroker?

a 2.4L can still rev out to bloody high numbers it is just people are more scared to look at the APC kit they rev theres out to 9600 so you could rev it out to 7000 with no issues or even 8000 with no issues as long as you have the mods to do it safe eg headwork

#135
DOUGMO

DOUGMO

    yoni lover

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 8,885 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
the 2.6 stroker kits are pretty exy, especially after the bock work has been done etc... the bc kits are over 5g now with the exchange rates.

still not a massive revver because of the rod ratio though but as you say 7g is fine

GENUINE CE9A evo2 gsr track car
all fabrication BJP AUTOMOTIVE
winton 1:27.4 /// sandown 1:21.5 /// phillip island 1:49.2 /// haunted hills 59.1
/// eastern creek 1:35.4 /// winton short 1:01.4


#136
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
i think going 2.6 is a bit of an overkill and is very exxy......by the time u get a turbo to match it, ud have stupid power then its driveline $$$$, well thats my understanding of it.......for street/track 2.3 would be nice.......but the destroked 2.1 is very appealing......would u guys say it would behave like a 2l b4 8000rpm????

#137
bazeng

bazeng

    Gday maaaate

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 9,899 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
if what would behave like a 2L?
the 2.1L?

the 2.1 will utilise longer rods and lighter pistons therefor you would get more torque than a 2.0L and also be able to rev it out alot more due to the improved rod ratio.

The rod ratio on:
2.1 destroked motor will be 1.84
2.0L which is 1.70
2.4L which is 1.5
1.6L using a 1.6L crank in a 2.4L block gives us a ratio of 2.13!!!! This thing will rev its guts out!! somebody build an NA one of these, it'll eat the honda's up!

Ideally, 1.5 and up is what we should aim for.

and example:

Honda's a considered to be high revving motors.
The B18C integra type r has a ratio of 1.58
The B16A's out of the type R civics have a 1.74

So all in all, although the stroker ratio's aren't that great, it's still not too bad!

a 2.6L based one 102mm stroke / 150mm rods (stock length) and shorter pistons will work out to be a ratio of: 1.47. This is where we go downhill.

Now if the 2.6L stroker had 102mm stroke with longer rods ie 162mm rods, we would have 1.58. This is ok but the position of the pins in the piston would not be ideal.

I'm guessing the 2.6L stoker would have 102mm stroker and 156mm rods with some sort of stroker style pistons which gives its a ratio of 1.52.

So it would still be ok.

Harry, I think the destroked 2.1L will be able to rev well beyond 10,000rpm safely. I honestly believe alot of so called 2.0L guys are either running a destroked 2.1L or if sticking with the 2.0L block, they are running a long red setup. Having the standard 2.0L combo rev to 10k+ would be difficult based on the weight of the piston. Unless of course they have super strong rods / crank.

Go the 2.3 or 2.4L Harry.
They are the most practical as rods will be off the shelf, so are the pistons.

#138
NASI

NASI

    Advanced Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 771 posts
  • LocationVIC
i might sell my 2.4L stroker kit and go the 2.1 option i love to rev out think of a gt3076 on a 2.1L or even a gt3582 on a 2.1L

#139
S15ETA

S15ETA

    Member

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 800 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
how much u gonna sell the stroker for rob?????:D.......shit mate, if u go 2.1 then u can run as bigger turbo as u like......like a 42r yeh???? well, thats if u wanna go down the drag strip.......

#140
evopwr

evopwr

    [DIY]

  • Active Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,283 posts
  • LocationMelbourne
sorry to hear the bad news about your engine harry; hopefully the evo will be on the road sooner then later!

also, massive LOL calling i2obert irobot in earlier posts!! hahahahahhaa!
---

4G63t, AWD, Widebody

Posted Image

---


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users