Jump to content

Welcome to 4GTuner
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!

Spetz

Spetz

Member Since 11 Jun 2016
Offline Last Active Jun 16 2019 10:16 AM
-----

Flywheel/Clutch diameter differences?

13 May 2019 - 12:12 PM

Hi everyone,

 

I noticed there are a few different flywheel/clutch diameter options from FWD, to GSR, FTO, Evo etc etc.

 

What effect does this have to how the clutch feels or operates?

I assume that a larger flywheel/clutch combo means more bite without a heavy clutch?


4G93 TD05 16G boost threshold

20 February 2019 - 12:45 PM

Hi everyone,

 

Does anyone know at what rpm would a TD05 16G start making usable boost on a mostly standard 4G93T?


4G93 Vs 4G63 Engine Weight

13 February 2019 - 10:01 AM

Hi guys,

 

Does anyone know the difference in weight before the 93 and 63?

 

Ideally for the Evo 4-6 shape.


4G93 Vs 4G63 turbo spooling

02 February 2019 - 01:04 AM

Hi everyone,

 

I have a CE coupe which I take to Winton for fun.

 

It currently has an FTO V6 in it so performance is adequate but as I am interested in handling I think it may be a disadvantage to have it due to weight at the front.

 

I have toyed with the idea of going 4 cylinder turbo, specifically the 4G93T from a CM5A.

 

Just wondering how well do these engines spool turbos up?
I am not interested in huge power (200kw at the front wheels is more than enough and will likely only run about 170-180kw) but good response is important.

So, an Evo 5 4G63 will likely make 200kw at the front wheels on the stock turbo and hit full boost by 3,000rpm (I assume?).

What would a 4G93T need as far as rpm to spool that same turbo to make the same power?

I understand the 1.8 will need more boost and likely cannot handle that power with a stock bottom end but the thing I am trying to figure out here is purely how much extra lag will the 1.8 have to gain the same type of performance as the 2.0.

 

Reasons I would like to avoid a 4G63 are primarily weight, cost, and of course complexity of installation.