for sale: evo2 turbo setup

[vuonguz]

comes with manifold and turbo its a tdo5 big 16 but not the BIG BIG like evo 3
no shaft play at all

looking to get rid of it about $400

 

[EVOCPE]

Wouldn't it be a small 16g? Not a big 16g

 

[3zercrowd]

Wouldn't it be a small 16g? Not a big 16g

Big 16g versus "Evo3 Big 16g" .25mm less on the inducer on the Comp wheel. B)

 

[vuonguz]

i thought the evo 1s were teh small 16g now this is confusing but to clarify its smaller than the evo 3 as
3zercrowd said

 

[Dean]

Need a price as per forum rules by this time tomorrow please.

 

[vuonguz]

bump

NO MORE FARKING BUMPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read this:

http://www.4gtuner.com/index.php?/forum-11/announcement-2-by-using-this-marketplace-you-agree-to-these-rules/

 

[milkandoj]

Big 16g versus"Evo3 Big 16g" .25mm less on the inducer on the Comp wheel. B)

I don't believe this i the case, a small 16g is smaller at the inducer and exducer but an Evo 1-2 big 16G is not smaller than an E3 big 16G.
I have an evo 1 turbo in my garage (as referenced by the serial number on compressor cover) I measure it as ~48mm (need another set of verniers) at the inducer , and gtpumps lists the evo 3 compressor wheel as being 48.3mm inducer, (68mm exducer, same as big16g, 18g and 20g).
Even if someone argues it could be an evo 2 turbo ect or the reference used for the serial number is wrong, its not an evo 3 serial number, there for not an E3 16g. While the small 16g defiantly came on the later RS vr4's i have read some threads where is seems it 'may' have come on some evo 1's as a option, regardless this one in my hand is a "big 16g".


If you believe the forum hype the Evo 3 big 16g is meant to flow more. The wheels are the same size, same number or blades, but apparently the aero is better. These are the airflow figures at 1 bar that are always quoted. I haven't yet read of a back to back test of an evo 1-2 big 16g verses a evo 3 big16g.
TDO5H-14B-6CM2 405 CFM
TDO5H-16G-7CM2 505 CFM
TDO5H-BIG16G-7CM 550 CFM



Now here s bit of (a possibly bullshit) idea i have..... Even though the Americans can really max out and do amazing things with the E3 16g16g.....
The Americans dont have easy access to evo 1-3 cars. And most the E3 big 16g's they play with on the 1g and 2g dsm's were brought new at some point not ripped of an original evo.
Is it possible that they just compare the E3 big 16g to the small 16g, and have do not have enough evo 1-2 big 16Gs to play with', so its come about that the E3 turbo is meant to be better because its evo 3 and the evo 3 car made more power in stock form? Everyone seems to have 14b's, some small 16gs around and then evo 3 16gs.
Its just an idea as i haven't seen a proper back to back test. If any one has seen one post it up!

 

[EVOCPE]

I always thought there were only 2 types of 16g, the small found on evo 1s and 2s and the big found on a few evo 2s and 3s

I guess I'm not up to date with it anymore lol

 

[3zercrowd]

I don't believe this i the case, a small 16g is smaller at the inducer and exducer but an Evo 1-2 big 16G is not smaller than an E3 big 16G. NOT true. A Big 16G's inducer is 48.06mm and the EVO3 Big 16G is 48.31mm therefore bigger.
I have an evo 1 turbo in my garage (as referenced by the serial number on compressor cover) I measure it as ~48mm (need another set of verniers) at the inducer , and gtpumps lists the evo 3 compressor wheel as being 48.3mm inducer, (68mm exducer, same as big16g, 18g and 20g).
Even if someone argues it could be an evo 2 turbo ect or the reference used for the serial number is wrong, its not an evo 3 serial number, there for not an E3 16g. While the small 16g defiantly came on the later RS vr4's i have read some threads where is seems it 'may' have come on some evo 1's as a option, regardless this one in my hand is a "big 16g".
As below those links are gold!
If you believe the forum hype the Evo 3 big 16g is meant to flow more. Not hype its true as the inducer is slightly bigger and therefore flows more The wheels are the same size, same number or blades, but apparently the aero is better. These are the airflow figures at 1 bar that are always quoted. I haven't yet read of a back to back test of an evo 1-2 big 16g verses a evo 3 big16g. Hmm, I have seen one somewhere but cant remember now anyone got one?TDO5H-14B-6CM2 405 CFM
TDO5H-16G-7CM2 505 CFM
TDO5H-BIG16G-7CM 550 CFM



Now here s bit of (a possibly bullshit) idea i have..... Even though the Americans can really max out and do amazing things with the E3 16g16g.....
The Americans dont have easy access to evo 1-3 cars. And most the E3 big 16g's they play with on the 1g and 2g dsm's were brought new at some point not ripped of an original evo.
Is it possible that they just compare the E3 big 16g to the small 16g, and have do not have enough evo 1-2 big 16Gs to play with', so its come about that the E3 turbo is meant to be better because its evo 3 and the evo 3 car made more power in stock form? Everyone seems to have 14b's, some small 16gs around and then evo 3 16gs.
Its just an idea as i haven't seen a proper back to back test. If any one has seen one post it up!

Above in RED
If you read this link and others from it you will see where I am talking about (im going to modify tims first post to show wheel sizes so its easier to see instead of having to working out each separate turbos flows and numbers and wheel sizes). http://www.4gtuner.com/index.php?/topic/1158-turbo-id-numbers-list/ and this is one of the best guides out there: http://www.stealth316.com/2-turboguide.htm