bob_oz
Well-Known Member
Hi Guys,
This is a Q about the realistic issues with the mag wheel to wheel hub flange mounting.
Background on issue:
I drive a pajero io - 5x114.3 stud pattern.
I'm upgrading my front calipers from piss-weak single pot calipers to twin pots using the evo 3 / rvr / fto single-to-twin conversion caliper direct swap approach commonly done overseas.
The primary problem is that my standard disks are 39mm hat height, 22mm thick and 285mm diameter, twin spots need 24mm and 276mm diameter, of which no stock hats are 39mm high.
There is also no room to move the brake frame inboard 5mm to clear a lancer/fto disk if fitted.
Loads of guys in Greece and Russia either:
* Lathe stock io disks down to 276mm diameter and just run the 22mm disk in place of the 24mm disk and change pads before they're worn out.
OR
* Fit a 5-6mm wheel spacer on the hub then run an FTO disk (45mm high, 276mm diameter 24mm thick).
personally i like the idea of just fitting the spacer under the disk to fix the offset issue and run off the shelf parts but that 5mm eats up the lip the wheel sits on the hub - but how important is it with mags?
The issue:
currently the stock mags on my io have a 6mm deep taper on the hub mounting hole such that when you fit them normally they only contact on about 3mm of the hub flange at best - fitting a 5mm spacer will remove this entirely.
I know with steel wheels using taper lock nuts you need this flange to carry the load of the wheel, but with mitsi mags using straight sided washered lug studs does the wheel still use this flange as a load bearing point - or do the studs and the contact friction between wheel and hub carry the load? is there anything really bad with not having contact under load?
just don't know
Thanks
This is a Q about the realistic issues with the mag wheel to wheel hub flange mounting.
Background on issue:
I drive a pajero io - 5x114.3 stud pattern.
I'm upgrading my front calipers from piss-weak single pot calipers to twin pots using the evo 3 / rvr / fto single-to-twin conversion caliper direct swap approach commonly done overseas.
The primary problem is that my standard disks are 39mm hat height, 22mm thick and 285mm diameter, twin spots need 24mm and 276mm diameter, of which no stock hats are 39mm high.
There is also no room to move the brake frame inboard 5mm to clear a lancer/fto disk if fitted.
Loads of guys in Greece and Russia either:
* Lathe stock io disks down to 276mm diameter and just run the 22mm disk in place of the 24mm disk and change pads before they're worn out.
OR
* Fit a 5-6mm wheel spacer on the hub then run an FTO disk (45mm high, 276mm diameter 24mm thick).
personally i like the idea of just fitting the spacer under the disk to fix the offset issue and run off the shelf parts but that 5mm eats up the lip the wheel sits on the hub - but how important is it with mags?
The issue:
currently the stock mags on my io have a 6mm deep taper on the hub mounting hole such that when you fit them normally they only contact on about 3mm of the hub flange at best - fitting a 5mm spacer will remove this entirely.
I know with steel wheels using taper lock nuts you need this flange to carry the load of the wheel, but with mitsi mags using straight sided washered lug studs does the wheel still use this flange as a load bearing point - or do the studs and the contact friction between wheel and hub carry the load? is there anything really bad with not having contact under load?
just don't know
Thanks